What Real Therapy Notes Look Like From AI (And What Clinicians Fixed)

The rise of AI in mental health documentation promises to free clinicians from administrative burdens. But what do these AI‑generated notes actually look like, and how do they compare to the final, compliant records a clinician submits? This article provides a side‑by‑side analysis of AI notes for therapists and the essential corrections made by clinicians. Explore the strengths, limitations, and non‑negotiable role of human clinical judgement in creating accurate, effective, and legally sound documentation.

What Real Therapy Notes From AI Are Designed to Do

AI therapy note generators are designed as documentation assistants. Their core functions are to:

1. Listen and Transcribe: Convert the spoken dialogue of a session into structured text
2. Identify Key Elements: Automatically detect and categorize information relevant to clinical notes, such as reported symptoms text.
3. Draft Within a Framework: Populate standard note formats (like SOAP or BIRP) with the captured data, creating a preliminary draft for the clinician.

The fundamental goal is to provide a first draft, saving clinicians time on transcription and formatting while ensuring no critical discussion points are completely missed.

What AI-Generated Therapy Notes Look Like in Practice

A raw AI‑generated note is typically a well‑structured but literal interpretation of the session's conversation. It reads as a factual summary of what was said, often presented in clear paragraphs under standard headers.

Example of a Raw AI Output (Subjective Section):

“Patient stated,’ I’ve been feeling more anxious this week, especially at work.’ Patient reported experiencing sleep difficulties, describing it as ‘trouble falling asleep.’ Patient said, ‘I tried the deep breathing we practiced, and it helped a little.’”

This output is clean and accurate to the words spoken, but lacks the synthesis and clinical framing that a clinician adds.

Standard Formats Used in AI Therapy Notes

Most AI documentation tools organize data into familiar clinical formats. Here's how they typically handle each:

What AI Therapy Notes Capture Well

Structure

AI excels at creating immediately recognizable, well‑organized notes. It consistently places information under the correct headings, ensuring all required sections are present, a significant time‑saver.

Objectivity

For recording direct quotes, reported symptoms, and discussed interventions, AI provides a high degree of objective reporting from the session dialogue.

Consistency

AI is not susceptible to fatigue. It maintains a consistent documentation style and thoroughness across all sessions, reducing variability in note detail.

Where AI Therapy Notes Fall Short of Real Clinical Documentation

Despite its strengths, AI notes lack the essence of clinical documentation: professional judgment. It cannot:

• Distinguish between a casually mentioned feeling and a clinically significant symptom.
• Understand the deeper context or thematic progress across multiple sessions.
• Interpret nonverbal cues or the therapeutic alliances quality.
• Make nuanced assessments that align with a diagnosis and treatment plan.

A raw AI note is a report of what was said; a clinical note is an analysis of what it means for treatment.

Common Errors Found in AI-Generated Therapy Notes

Clinicians reviewing AI drafts frequently encounter several categories of errors.

1. Hallucinations/Inaccuracies: The AI might mishear a word or phrase and insert incorrect information.
2. Over-inclusion: AI may capture and include irrelevant or minor details, violating the “Minimum Necessary” standard for HIPAA.
3. Lack of Synthesis: It lists symptoms but fails to connect them meaningfully (e.g., not linking “sleep difficulties” and “irritability” to the core diagnosis of depression).
4. Misattribution: It could incorrectly attribute a statement or intervention.
5. Simplistic Assessment: The “Assessment” or “Response” section often states the obvious rather than providing professional insight.

What Clinicians Fixed in Real Therapy Notes Generated by AI

This is where human expertise transforms a generic draft into a professional record. Heres a breakdown of critical clinician corrections:

Adding Clinical Nuance and Context to AI Therapy Notes

• AI Draft: “Patient said they felt ‘bad’”
• Clinician Fix: “Patient described an increase in depressive symptoms, specifically anhedonia and low mood, which they rated as a 7/10 in severity.”

Correcting Hallucinations and Inaccuracies in AI Therapy Notes

• AI Draft: ”Patient discussed issues with their ‘brother’.”
• Clinician Fix: “Patient discussed ongoing conflict with their ‘partner’” (Correcting a critical misheard word.)

Aligning AI Therapy Notes With Treatment Plans and Diagnoses

• AI Draft: “Patient talked about work and stress arguments.”
• Clinician Fix: “Discussed interpersonal triggers at work as they relate to the treatment goal of reducing social anxiety symptoms (GAD F41.1). Practiced cognitive restructuring around fear of negative evaluation.”

Incorporating Nonverbal Observations Missing From AI Therapy Notes

• AI Draft: (No observation)
• Clinician Fix: Added to Objective section: “Patient presented with congruent affect, made good eye contact, but was visibly tearful when discussing family history.”

Ensuring Minimum Necessary and Compliant AI Therapy Notes

• AI Draft: Included a detailed, verbatim anecdote about a third-party not involved in treatment.
• Clinician Fix: Summarized clinically: “Patient processed a recent conflict with a colleague, exploring their emotional response. Specific identifying details of the colleague were omitted per the minimum necessary standard.”

Clinician Responsibility and Liability in Final AI Therapy Notes

It is a fundamental ethical and legal principle: The signing clinician retains full responsibility for the content of the note. A note generated by AI is ultimately your clinical documentation. Insurance companies, licensing boards, and courts hold the clinician, not the AI tool, accountable for its accuracy, appropriateness, and compliance. Thorough review and editing are not just best practices; they are mandatory for risk management.

Best Practices for Reviewing and Editing Real Therapy Notes From AI

1. Review Immediately: Edit the note while the session is fresh in your mind.
2. Fact-Check Rigorously: Listen for and correct any “hallucinations” or inaccuracies.
3. Elevate the Assessment: Replace simplistic summaries with your professional formulation.
4. Prune for Compliance: Remove extraneous details that violate privacy principles.
5. Align with Treatment Plan: Explicitly connect session content to goals and diagnosis.
6. Add your Voice: Ensure the final note reflects your therapeutic approach and style.

How Twofold Helps Clinicians Create Accurate, Compliant AI Therapy Notes

Twofolds AI therapy notes solution is built with clinician oversight as the cornerstone. Our platform is designed to mitigate common AI errors and streamline the review process.

• Structured Editing Workflow: The interface makes it easy to quickly scan, listen to source audio for verification, and edit sections.
• Customization Prompts: You can guide the AI to align with your preferred terminology and focus areas.
• Integration with Workflow: Drafts are created seamlessly within your documentation process, not as a separate, disjointed step.

Conclusion

Therapy notes from AI are powerful drafts, not finished products. They offer unparalleled efficiency in capturing objective data. However, they require the essential intervention of clinical expertise to add nuance, correct errors, ensure compliance, and transform a transcript into a tool for effective, ethical care.

The most effective use of AI in documentation is as a collaborative partner: let it handle the foundation, so you can build the insightful, personalized clinical record that truly represents your work.