Best Reviewed AI Medical Scribe (2025) – According to Clinicians

Methodology – how we built a “best ranked” list instead of hype

1. Data pool: 3,100 clinician‑written reviews posted Jan 2024 – Aug 2025 on G2, Capterra, Software Advice and Reddit subs r/medicine, r/Psychiatry & r/therapists.
2. Scoring: average star rating (40 %), HIPAA/SOC‑2 proof (25 %), edit‑time savings (20 %), pricing clarity (10 %), customer‑support sentiment (5 %).
3. Cut‑line: only tools with ≥ 4.5/5 average on at least two review sites made the final list.

Bottom line: Every product below is both top‑ranked by clinicians and verifiably secure.

1. Twofold Health — crowdsourced #1

★ 4.9/5 on G2  – “Fastest draft in clinic, sub‑30 seconds.”
★ 4.9/5 on Capterra  – “Zero learning curve, best bang‑for‑buck.”

Reddit comment on Twofold:

“Twofold’s accuracy was very good, especially once I built my own templates. Note processing time was way shorter than the other two scribes I tried.”

Pros

• 20–30 s SOAP/DAP/MSE drafts; flat $49 / mo (annual) with BAA.
• Highly customizable via custom template.
• Audio auto‑purged post‑processing.
• iOS and Android app for best mobile experience
• Full support for telehealth and virtual sessions
• 24/7 premium customer support on all tiers.

Why it tops every “best reviewed AI medical scribe” list: unmatched speed‑to‑note plus perfect 4.9 averages on two major review sites.

2. Nuance DAX Copilot — hospital‑system darling

★ 4.8/5 on Software Advice – “Epic integration is seamless—worth the price.”
★ 4.7/5 on G2 – “Cuts charting by half but onboarding fee is steep.”

“Using DAX in the ER. It’s nice to have everything laid out, but I still do a fair amount of editing.”Reddit

Pros

• Ambient capture embedded in Epic/Cerner; note lands in 2–3 min.
• HITRUST + Azure‑level security.

Cons

1. $1,200 onboarding + $500–700 / mo per provider.
2. Dragon‑compatible EHRs only.
3. Requires enterprise IT sign‑off.
4. Verbose A/P section needs trimming.

3. Suki AI — highest mobile rating

★ 4.8/5 on G2 – “iPhone mic, 15 min/day charting—game‑changer.”
★ 4.6/5 on Capterra – “Multilingual dictation nailed my Spanish clinics.”

Reddit post mentions:

“I’ve used Suki. Hated it—great HPI, but the A/P is a bloated paragraph that adds work.”

Pros

• Pulls schedule from EHR; voice‑only workflow.
• 14‑language support (May 2025 update).

Cons

1. $399 / mo flat fee—steep for part‑timers.
2. Works best with external mic; laptop mics degrade accuracy.
3. No ambient analytics dashboard.
4. HIPAA BAA only on Business plan.

4. Ambience Healthcare — top star‑rating for coding precision

★ 4.7/5 on G2 – “CPT suggestions 95 % accurate in audit.”
★ 4.6/5 on Software Advice – “Loved by billing team; pricey ceiling mics though.”

On the same thread, the following comment can be found:

“Having used Ambience for a few months now, I’ve been quite happy. It’s accurate and finally integrates with the EMR, saving time.”

Pros

• Problem‑oriented A/P plus auto‑coding.
• SOC‑2 & HITRUST; ceiling mic array captures group sessions.

Cons

1. Pricing on request; enterprise budgets only.
2. English‑only draft; multilingual “coming soon.”
3. Hardware purchase required.
4. 90‑second average draft—slower than Twofold/Suki.

5. Abridge — highest KLAS ranking, strong Epic scores

★ 4.7/5 on G2 – “Patient recap PDFs are client favourites.”
★ 4.6/5 on Capterra – “KLAS winner but 30‑day audio retention limits viability.”

“For Epic users, there’s Abridge—records the visit and spits out a summary. It’s been a success for several providers here.”Reddit

Pros

• One‑tap launch in Epic Haiku/Canto; note in < 2 min.
• Auto‑creates lay‑language visit summaries.

Cons

1. 30‑day cloud retention may breach strict org policies.
2. Enterprise sales only—no single licenses.
3. English/Spanish output; no other languages.
4. Requires Epic Ambient Listening license.

6. Augmedix Go — best human‑in‑the‑loop rating

★ 4.8/5 on Software Advice – “Remote scribe nailed complex ortho visits.”
★ 4.6/5 on G2 – “Live person + AI = highest accuracy, but slower.”

Pros

• Hybrid AI + live scribe; deep chart‑prep.
• Works across 35+ specialties.

Cons

1. 3–5 min turnaround vs. seconds for full‑AI.
2. Wearable camera or phone stand required.
3. Minimum 5‑provider contract.
4. Hidden per‑minute audio surcharge at high volumes.

7. Freed AI — top budget rating

★ 4.6/5 on G2 – “Flat price, narrative style is solid.”
★ 4.5/5 on Capterra – “Great starter scribe; styling drifts though.”

“The note Freed generated was precise, comprehensive, and actually sounded like me—huge time‑saver.” Reddit

Neutral Pros

• $99 / mo flat fee; no extra minutes.
• Browser + mobile; EHR‑agnostic.

Cons

1. Style varies between notes.
2. Free tier daily minute limits.
3. No offline capture.
4. Peak‑hour slow‑downs reported.

Quick‑view leaderboard (weighted clinician rating)

Why clinicians crown Twofold the winner

When we normalized star ratings against price, draft speed and HIPAA status, Twofold Health rose to the top by a decisive margin. Clinicians praise its sub‑30‑second drafts, therapist‑and physician‑ready templates, and “no‑surprises” $49 flat fee—features that pushed its G2 and Capterra scores to an unmatched 4.9/5.

High‑profile contenders like Nuance DAX or Ambience excel inside large, budget‑rich health systems; Suki owns the mobile niche; Abridge delights patients with recap PDFs; Augmedix wins on human QA; Freed remains the wallet‑friendly starter. Yet none deliver Twofold’s blend of best‑in‑class reviews, transparent pricing and lightning speed.

If your goal is to deploy the best reviewed AI medical scribe without months of procurement red tape, Twofold Health remains the clinician‑backed, data‑validated choice for 2025.