Free for a week, then $19 for your first month
Comparisons

Best Overall Berries AI Alternative for Therapists and Group Practices (2026)

Looking for the best Berries AI alternative? Compare Berries vs Twofold on pricing, capture methods, treatment plans, ICD-10 coding, EHR fit, and group-practice readiness for mental health professionals.

Best Overall Berries AI Alternative for Therapists and Group Practices (2026) hero image

If you're a therapist, social worker, or psychiatry NP evaluating Berries AI, the real question is not whether Berries is a strong product. It is. Berries publicly positions itself as the “AI Scribe for Mental Health Professionals,” with treatment plans, ICD‑10 diagnosis suggestions, in‑person and virtual session capture, SOC 2 certification with HIPAA and PHIPA compliance, and a free trial that gives you 20 sessions up front plus 10 sessions per month after.

But if you're looking for the best overall Berries AI alternative — especially if you bill across both therapy and broader outpatient encounters, run a group practice, or want a single tool that scales beyond a solo therapist's workflow — Twofold is the stronger choice overall. Twofold publishes transparent per‑seat pricing (and group‑practice pricing) publicly, includes four capture methods (live, dictate, upload audio, upload handwritten notes via OCR), ships an AI assistant that goes beyond drafts to suggest homework ideas and answer progress questions, and offers 24/7 human support on every plan — not gated to an enterprise tier.

What Berries does well

Any fair comparison should start with Berries's strengths. Berries is unusually focused: it doesn't try to serve cardiology or orthopedics — it's built end‑to‑end for mental health. The homepage is full of mental‑health language ("We'll write your notes so you can change lives"), the templates are mental‑health‑tailored, and the resource pages call out therapists, social workers, psychiatrists, and psychiatric nurse practitioners specifically.

Berries has a credible public compliance posture for clinicians who handle PHI: SOC 2 certification, HIPAA and PHIPA compliance, encryption in transit and at rest, no session‑recording storage, and an explicit promise that PHI is not used to train its AI models. Its free trial is generous — 20 sessions up front and then 10 sessions per month with no credit card — which makes evaluating the scribe genuinely low‑risk.

That makes Berries a legitimate option, especially for solo therapists who want a narrow, mental‑health‑only tool and don't need to grow into broader outpatient or multi‑clinician workflows.

Why therapists still search for a Berries alternative

The reason therapists search for a Berries alternative is usually not that Berries lacks capability for solo session notes. It is that the Pro plan is $79/month — $948/year — with no annual discount listed on the public pricing page, and the Group Practice tier is "Custom," which means a sales call before a clinic owner can compare it apples‑to‑apples against tools that publish their group pricing.

Therapists also tell us they want a capture method beyond live and virtual sessions — they want to upload a handwritten note from a session they couldn't record, or paste a dictated summary into the AI and have it write the note. And group‑practice owners want a single tool that fits the therapist AND the psych NP AND the primary‑care colleague in the same building, not three different scribes with three different BAAs.

Comparison table of Berries AI versus Twofold across five dimensions mental-health clinicians evaluate when shortlisting an AI scribe: pricing model where Berries offers Pro at 79 dollars per month unlimited and a Custom Group Practice tier while Twofold offers Personal at 69 dollars monthly or 49 dollars annual with group pricing posted publicly; specialty fit where Berries is exclusively mental health for therapists, social workers, and psychiatry while Twofold serves therapy, behavioral health, and broader outpatient so the tool grows with the practice; capture methods where Berries supports live in-person and virtual sessions while Twofold offers four capture methods including live session, dictated summary, uploaded audio, and uploaded handwritten notes via OCR; AI assistant and treatment plans where Berries offers treatment plans and ICD-10 suggestions while Twofold ships SMART-goal treatment plans plus ICD and CPT suggestions plus homework ideas plus a progress questions Q&A; support and group readiness where Berries offers dedicated support and a sales call for group practices while Twofold provides 24/7 human support on every plan with group pricing posted publicly and organization-wide BAA coverage. Twofold column is highlighted as the recommended Berries AI alternative for therapists and group practices.

Berries AI vs Twofold — five dimensions therapists and group-practice owners actually weigh when picking an AI scribe.

Why Twofold is the best overall Berries alternative

1. Twofold is cheaper at annual billing — without sacrificing the mental-health workflow

Twofold's Personal plan is $69/month billed monthly or $49/month billed annually — that's $588/year on the annual plan. Berries Pro is $79/month with no annual discount published, which works out to $948/year. For a solo therapist on annual billing, Twofold is roughly $360/year cheaper for the same unlimited use, and you don't lose the mental‑health‑specific workflow: Twofold publishes SMART‑goal treatment plans with a "Golden‑Thread" feature designed for behavioral‑health continuity.

For group practices the gap widens, because Twofold publishes group‑practice pricing while Berries asks you to schedule a sales call to evaluate the Group Practice tier.

2. Twofold accepts more ways to capture a session

Berries supports live in‑person and virtual sessions, with optional headphone setups for telehealth. That covers the most common case but leaves a few real‑world gaps: sessions you couldn't record live, dictated summaries you'd rather have the AI structure for you, and handwritten paper notes from a previous session.

Twofold supports all four: live session capture, a dictated‑summary mode, audio uploads, and handwritten‑note OCR. The handwritten mode is the one therapists mention most often when they switch — it turns the stack of paper notes from a past intake into a structured AI‑drafted record without re‑typing.

3. Twofold's AI assistant goes beyond drafting the note

Berries's AI is focused on the note itself: clinical note generation, treatment plans, and ICD‑10 diagnosis suggestions. Twofold's AI assistant adds three more things therapists ask for: homework idea generation, a progress‑question Q&A that lets you ask "how has this client changed over the last 8 sessions?" against the notes you've already written, and both ICD‑10 and CPT code suggestions for clinicians who bill medical‑necessity codes alongside therapy codes. If you care about what makes an AI therapy note feel clinically true rather than generic, that broader assistant surface is where the difference shows up.

That breadth is why therapists who do a lot of CBT, DBT, or behavioral‑activation work between sessions tend to prefer Twofold — the assistant participates in the work between visits, not just the note at the end of one.

4. Twofold ships 24/7 human support on every plan

Berries's pricing page lists "dedicated support," but doesn't specify 24/7 availability or whether that support level is the same across the Trial, Pro, and Group Practice tiers. For solo therapists this often isn't a deal‑breaker — until the day you have a session note that won't sync at 9pm and you have no way to talk to a human.

Twofold publishes 24/7 human support on every plan, including the entry‑level Personal plan. For clinicians who work evenings and weekends — which is most of the therapy world — that's a meaningful operational difference, not a marketing line.

5. Twofold scales beyond solo therapists with public group-practice pricing

If you run a group practice — multiple therapists, intake coordinators, billing support — you usually want to know the per‑seat cost before you sit through a sales call. Berries's Group Practice tier is "Custom" on the public pricing page, which is fine but means an extra evaluation step. Twofold posts its group pricing publicly and offers an organization‑wide BAA, which is exactly what group owners ask for when they're comparing scribes. It also handles features that group‑therapy programs specifically need — like multi‑speaker capture for group-therapy diarization — that solo‑clinician scribes don't always tune for.

That posted‑pricing posture is one of the most‑cited reasons multi‑clinician practices pick Twofold as the best overall Berries alternative — it shortens the procurement loop, which matters for owners juggling clinical work alongside running the business.

Berries vs Twofold: which one should you choose?

Choose Berries if you're a solo therapist who wants the narrowest, most mental‑health‑focused tool, you value a generous free trial (20 + 10/month) to evaluate before paying, and you're confident you won't need a tool that scales to broader outpatient work or a group practice in the near term.

Choose Twofold if you want the best overall solution for therapists, behavioral‑health practices, and group practices that mix therapy with broader outpatient documentation. Twofold is the stronger choice when your evaluation criteria include annual‑billing savings, four capture methods (including handwritten OCR), a broader AI assistant that helps between sessions, 24/7 human support on every plan, posted group‑practice pricing, and SMART‑goal treatment plans with golden‑thread continuity.

Five-card grid summarising why Twofold is the best overall Berries AI alternative for therapists and group practices: card one cheaper annual price where Twofold is 588 dollars per year on annual billing versus Berries Pro at 948 dollars per year with the same unlimited use; card two four capture methods where Twofold supports live recording, dictated summary, uploaded audio, and uploaded handwritten notes via OCR including paper notes Berries does not support; card three broader AI assistant that goes beyond drafts to include homework ideas, progress-question Q&A, and both ICD-10 and CPT code suggestions; card four 24/7 human support available on every Twofold plan rather than gated to enterprise tiers requiring an upgrade; card five group-practice readiness with posted group-practice pricing and organization-wide BAA coverage so practice owners do not need a Custom sales call to evaluate the platform.

Five concrete reasons therapists and group practices switch from Berries to Twofold.

Final verdict

Twofold is the best overall Berries AI alternative. Berries is a credible mental‑health‑only AI scribe with strong compliance posture, treatment plans, and a generous free trial. But for therapists who want annual‑billing savings, broader capture options, a between‑session AI assistant, always‑on support, and a path that scales from solo to group practice, Twofold is the stronger overall answer for 2026.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

  • What is the best Berries AI alternative?

    For most therapists, behavioral‑health practices, and group practices, the best Berries AI alternative is Twofold. Berries is a strong mental‑health‑only scribe, but Twofold matches its therapy workflow and adds capabilities Berries doesn't ship.

    • Cheaper annual billing: $588/year on the Twofold annual plan vs $948/year for Berries Pro.
    • More capture methods: live, dictated summary, audio upload, and handwritten-note OCR — four ways to get a note started.
    • Broader AI assistant: homework idea generation, a progress-question Q&A across past notes, and both ICD-10 and CPT suggestions.
    • 24/7 human support on every plan: not gated to enterprise or Group Practice tiers.
    • Group-practice ready: posted group pricing and organization-wide BAA — no "Custom" sales call to evaluate.
  • Is Berries AI still a good option for therapists?

    Yes. Berries is a credible mental‑health‑only scribe and a fair pick for solo therapists who don't need to scale beyond a one‑clinician workflow. Pick Berries when:

    • You want a mental-health-only tool: the templates, language, and resource pages are exclusively therapy/psychiatry.
    • You want a long, free trial first: 20 sessions up front + 10 sessions per month with no credit card.
    • Your sessions are always live (in-person or virtual): Berries doesn't offer handwritten-note OCR or dictated-summary capture.
    • You're solo and don't expect group-practice growth: Berries Group Practice is "Custom" — fine for now, harder to compare against tools with posted group pricing.
  • Why is Twofold cheaper than Berries on annual billing?

    Twofold publishes a clear annual discount on its Personal plan. Berries's pricing page lists Pro at a single $79/month price with no annual discount. The math:

    • Twofold Personal (annual): $49/month billed annually = $588/year.
    • Twofold Personal (monthly): $69/month billed monthly = $828/year.
    • Berries Pro: $79/month, $948/year (no annual discount listed on the public pricing page).
    • Annual savings switching to Twofold: roughly $360/year for a solo clinician on the annual plan — same unlimited use.
    • Group-practice differential: wider, because Twofold posts group pricing while Berries Group Practice is a sales-call "Custom" quote.
  • Does Berries AI support group practices?

    Berries has a Group Practice plan but it's listed as "Custom" — you can't see per‑seat pricing without contacting sales. Twofold's group‑practice readiness is different in a few specific ways:

    • Posted group-practice pricing: Twofold publishes group pricing on the site; Berries requires a sales conversation first.
    • Organization-wide BAA: Twofold offers a single org-wide BAA for the whole practice; Berries handles BAAs but doesn't surface the group structure publicly.
    • 24/7 human support on every plan: Twofold support tier is the same across plans; Berries doesn't specify whether the Group Practice tier upgrades the support SLA.
    • Group-therapy capture: Twofold's multi-speaker diarization is built for group sessions, where attribution to specific patients matters for the note.
  • How does Berries handle treatment plans vs Twofold?

    Both ship treatment plans for mental health, but the implementations differ in a few ways therapists usually notice during evaluation:

    • Treatment-plan availability: Berries lists "Treatment plan" generation on the homepage; Twofold ships SMART-goal treatment plans with a "Golden-Thread" feature for cross-session continuity.
    • Carry-over across notes: both tools surface treatment-plan context inside notes; Twofold's Golden-Thread explicitly links the plan to each subsequent session note.
    • Progress tracking: Twofold's AI assistant can answer progress questions across past notes (e.g. "how has this client changed in 8 sessions?"); Berries doesn't surface that capability on its public pages.
    • Homework ideas: Twofold's assistant generates homework/between-session task suggestions tied to the plan; Berries doesn't publicly describe an equivalent feature.