Best AI for Dental Clinical Notes and Charting (2026)

Dental documentation is different. It is not just “a note.” You often need tooth‑specific charting, perio measurements, materials and surfaces, anesthesia details, diagnosis and treatment narratives, and clean language that supports claim quality and continuity of care.

This guide focuses on AI for dental clinical notes and charting, including options that support voice perio charting and AI dental scribe workflows.

How we evaluated tools

For dental clinical notes and charting, the biggest differentiators tend to be:

• Charting fit: perio, tooth numbers, surfaces, materials, procedure narratives
• Workflow flexibility: ambient recording vs dictation vs template-first notes
• Editing burden: how much cleanup is typically required after generation
• Compliance posture (vendor-stated): HIPAA, BAA availability, retention controls
• Team rollout: setup effort, integration dependence, training time
• Real-world feedback: what clinicians and dental teams discuss in active communities

Quick comparison table

Pricing and compliance claims change. Treat these as vendor-stated and verify before procurement.

1) Twofold Health

What does it do

Twofold is an AI documentation platform that generates structured clinical notes from multiple input workflows, not just ambient recording. Twofold also publishes HIPAA and BAA materials in its help center.

Who is it for

Dental practices and DSOs that want one tool to support:

• Dentists and hygienists with different documentation preferences
• Procedure-based notes and visit summaries
• Teams that sometimes cannot record (or prefer not to)

Key features

• Multiple note-generation workflows (recording is optional)
• Custom templates and structured outputs (useful for dental procedure formats)
• HIPAA compliance guidance and a posted BAA workflow
• EHR export workflow for moving notes into existing systems

Pros

• Flexible capture options (helpful when patient consent or clinic policy varies)
• Easier to standardize across multiple providers using templates
• Clear vendor documentation on HIPAA and BAA availability

Pricing

• Personal plan is listed at $69/month (monthly) or $49/month (annual billing).

Privacy, HIPAA, and BAA notes (vendor-stated)

• Twofold states HIPAA-focused handling of PHI and provides HIPAA compliance documentation.
• Twofold states that a BAA is included/available via its posted BAA article.
• Twofold states you do not have to record the full visit, and outlines multiple workflows.

What dental teams say (community links)

• Clinicians describing quick setup, solid accuracy, helpful templates, and responsive support: https://www.reddit.com/r/FamilyMedicine/comments/1lokist/i_tried_all_the_ai_medical_scribes_so_you_dont/
• A clinic-style post reporting meaningful time savings and smoother team workflow after adopting Twofold: https://www.reddit.com/r/FamilyMedicine/comments/1lokist/i_tried_all_the_ai_medical_scribes_so_you_dont/https://www.reddit.com/r/aiscribing/comments/1nig777/our_experience_with_twofold_ai_scribe/
• Users describing building and sharing templates across a practice and being happy with results: https://www.reddit.com/r/FamilyMedicine/comments/1ifh8rt/twofold_ai_scribe_custom_templates/
• Multiple comments calling Twofold easy to use, affordable, and requiring minimal editing on many notes: https://www.reddit.com/r/FamilyMedicine/comments/1ggmdf8/thoughtsexperiences_working_with_ai_scribes/

2) Denti.AI

What does it do

Denti.AI markets a dentistry‑specific suite that includes voice perio charting and an AI dental scribe that can generate clinical notes from captured visit audio.

Who is it for

Dental teams that want a more dentistry‑native, voice‑first workflow for perio charting and clinical notes.

Key features

• Voice perio charting module with location-based pricing shown
• Scribe product marketed as HIPAA-secure and template-ready
• Bundle pricing shown for Scribe + Voice Perio
• Vendor-stated compliance content including BAA availability

Pros

• Dentistry-specific positioning (perio and scribe in one ecosystem)
• Public bundle pricing is clearly listed

Cons

• Vendor help content states recordings may be stored without a set time limit unless customized, which can be a decision point for some clinics
• Voice-first workflows can require training and operatory adjustments (mic placement, commands, correcting mishears)

Pricing (public, highest listed bundle)

• Denti.AI Scribe + Voice Perio: $399/month (shown publicly).

Privacy, HIPAA, and BAA notes (vendor-stated)

• Denti.AI markets HIPAA compliance and also states BAA availability in its compliance materials.
• Vendor FAQ indicates recordings can be retained unless retention rules are customized.

What dental teams say (community links)

• r/DentalHygiene thread mentioning Denti.AI usage with Eaglesoft and optional full-appointment listening (supports observations about “creep factor” and selective feature use):
  https://www.reddit.com/r/DentalHygiene/comments/1qkw134/anyone_use_voice_activated_perio_charting/
• r/Dentistry thread on AI notes tools mentioning hygiene-focused demos and general caution (supports the idea that teams evaluate accuracy and liability concerns):
  https://www.reddit.com/r/Dentistry/comments/1htr3zk/anyone_using_any_ai_notes_software_in_dentistry/

3) Overjet Voice (DentalBee)

What does it do

Overjet added voice‑powered clinical documentation through its acquisition of DentalBee, positioning “Voice” as an ambient solution to document, monitor, and analyze visits, including hands‑free perio charting and automated clinical notes (as described by Overjet and industry coverage).

Who is it for

Organizations that already use, or are considering, the Overjet ecosystem and want voice documentation as part of a larger platform approach.

Key features

• Hands-free perio charting and automated clinical notes (as described by Overjet)
• “Voice” positioned as ambient documentation within Overjet’s suite
• Public pricing page exists for DentalBee-branded offering
• BAA page is publicly posted

Pros

• Dental-specific voice documentation suite positioning
• Publicly posted BAA is easy to find

Cons

• As a suite tied to a broader platform, procurement and rollout can be heavier than lightweight note tools
• Ambient capture expectations may require strong consent and clear retention controls, depending on clinic policy

Pricing (public)

• DentalBee pricing page shows $129/office/month for a listed product line.

Privacy, HIPAA, and BAA notes (vendor-stated)

• DentalBee posts a BAA page and markets HIPAA compliance on-site.
• Industry coverage describes voice-enabled documentation capabilities after the acquisition.

What dental teams say (community links)

• r/Dentistry “AI in dentistry” thread includes a comment describing a clinic testing and using DentalBee and mentions responsiveness, alongside broader skepticism about AI tools (supports real-world mixed sentiment and implementation considerations):
  https://www.reddit.com/r/Dentistry/comments/1mmi756/ai_in_dentistry/
• r/Dentistry broader AI tools discussion (supports that practices evaluate multiple tools and debate benefit vs “training insurers” concerns):
  https://www.reddit.com/r/Dentistry/comments/1i4bba8/are_any_of_you_using_ai_tools_in_your_practice_yet/

4) Bola AI

What does it do

Bola AI provides voice‑driven solutions used in dentistry for documentation and charting. Dentaltown describes a partnership where Henry Schein One and Bola offer Dentrix Voice for verbal charting and scheduling.

Who is it for

Practices that want voice charting workflows, especially those already aligned with certain practice management ecosystems.

Key features

• Voice-driven charting workflows (Dentrix Voice partnership described by Dentaltown)
• Published BAA document (PDF)
• Published consent form language referencing HIPAA handling (PDF)

Pros

• Clear availability of a BAA document on the vendor site
• Voice charting positioning with well-known dental software context (Dentrix Voice)

Cons

• Public pricing is not clearly listed in the sources above, so budgeting often requires a sales conversation
• Voice workflows can be sensitive to operatory noise, mic choice, and staff training

Pricing

• Pricing is not clearly published on the pages cited here. (Commonly requires demo/quote.)

Privacy, HIPAA, and BAA notes (vendor-stated)

• Bola hosts a Business Associate Agreement PDF.
• Bola’s consent form states captured data is handled in HIPAA-compliant ways and encrypted (vendor-stated).

What dental teams say (community links)

• r/Dentistry thread asking about Bola AI and expressing concerns around charting accuracy when dependent on vocal dictation (supports “trust but verify” sentiment):
  https://www.reddit.com/r/Dentistry/comments/1jv74j5/bola_ai/
• Dentaltown article describing Dentrix Voice and the Bola partnership (supports product positioning and integration context):
  https://www.dentaltown.com/magazine/article/9348/ai-roundup-roundtable

5) Kiroku

What does it do

Kiroku is an AI‑assisted note platform commonly used for structured clinical notes with templates. It is often described as speeding up documentation through guided templates rather than full ambient listening.

Who is it for

Dental teams that want faster, more consistent written notes via structured templates and clickable flows.

Key features

• Pricing page with tiered plans
• HIPAA and GDPR compliance claims in its FAQ/help materials
• Trust center presence for controls and compliance information

Pros

• Template-driven structure can reduce “blank page” time and standardize phrasing
• Compliance claims are described clearly in Kiroku’s own help materials

Cons

• If you want true ambient visit capture, template-first workflows can feel less automatic
• Depending on your setup, you may rely on copy-paste or external workflows rather than deep EHR embedding

Pricing (public)

• Kiroku publishes pricing on its site (see pricing page).

Privacy, HIPAA, and BAA notes (vendor-stated)

• Kiroku states it is HIPAA and GDPR compliant and provides privacy guidance on recordings and confidentiality.

What dental teams say (community links)

• r/Dentistry thread mentions Kiroku’s template-driven behavior (supports the “structured templates” positioning):
  https://www.reddit.com/r/Dentistry/comments/19fm4gy/template_notes_to_share/
• r/Dentistry thread listing Kiroku among dental AI notes tools (supports that it is known in the market and evaluated alongside others):
  https://www.reddit.com/r/Dentistry/comments/1htr3zk/anyone_using_any_ai_notes_software_in_dentistry/

Conclusion

If you are evaluating the best AI for dental clinical notes and charting in 2026, the safest path is to choose a tool that reduces documentation time without creating new risk around accuracy, consent, or retention.

For most dental practices, Twofold is the recommended starting point because it is flexible across workflows (recording is optional), supports structured templates you can tailor to dental procedures, and has clear vendor documentation around HIPAA and BAAs. It also tends to be easier to standardize across a team than dentistry‑only voice suites if you have a mix of dentists and hygienists with different preferences.

Whichever direction you choose, run a short pilot using your real note templates, measure edit time per note, and confirm retention and BAA details in writing before rolling out across the practice.