Free for a week, then $19 for your first month
What is the best AI medical scribe for my practice? Hero Im

What is the best AI medical scribe for my practice?

Dr. Danni Steimberg's profile picture
By 
on
Reviewed by 
Expert Verified
3 min read

Question by a member of our Twofold community

“I run a small outpatient practice and I’m overwhelmed by documentation. I’ve seen a bunch of AI scribes online and they all claim to be accurate and HIPAA-safe, but I don’t know what actually matters. I need something that works for my visit types (problem-based notes, follow-ups, some procedures), keeps notes concise, and does not create copy-paste looking notes. I also need a real BAA, clear data handling, and ideally an easy way to get notes into my EHR. How do I choose the best AI medical scribe for my practice without wasting weeks testing the wrong tools?”

Brief Answer

The “best” AI medical scribe is the one that matches your workflow and risk tolerance: (1) a signed BAA and clear privacy posture, (2) consistently accurate notes in your specialty’s structure, (3) fast review and export into your EHR, and (4) predictable pricing that works at your scale. If you are a small or mid‑sized outpatient practice, tools designed for SMB workflows and quick adoption tend to win on time‑to‑value, while enterprise‑focused tools often win on deep EHR embedding.

The Longer Answer

Step 1: Decide what “best” means for your practice

Pick your top 3 priorities and evaluate everything through that lens.

Priority

When it matters most

What to look for

Compliance

Any PHI, always

Signed BAA, encryption, retention controls, audit logs, clear subcontractor handling (BAA chain)

Accuracy + brevity

High volume clinics

Specialty-appropriate templates, ability to control note style, minimal hallucinations

Workflow speed

You are charting at night

Draft appears quickly, easy edits, fewer clicks, reliable export

EHR fit

You live in Epic/athena/etc.

Direct integration vs copy/paste vs document upload

Cost predictability

Groups and growing clinics

Transparent pricing, scaling without surprise overages

Step 2: Use a “non-negotiables” checklist

If a vendor fails any of these, move on.

Compliance essentials

  • Offers a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) for HIPAA workflows
  • States how they handle PHI and subcontractors (and whether PHI is used for training)

Clinical essentials

  • Produces your note types (SOAP, A/P per problem, psych, procedure notes)
  • Lets you control length and structure (otherwise notes balloon and you still edit)
  • Handles medications, orders, and follow-up instructions reliably

Operational essentials

  • Export path is frictionless (EHR integration or one-click copy into your template)
  • Works in telehealth and in-room, with good audio capture

Step 3: Match the tool category to your setting

Different “best” answers by practice type:

Practice setting

Usually best fit

Why

Solo or small outpatient

Lightweight scribes with fast setup and templates

You need time savings immediately with minimal IT overhead

Mid-size groups

Tools with admin controls, shared templates, predictable scaling

Standardization matters across clinicians

Enterprise health systems

Deep EHR-embedded platforms

Procurement and integration matter most (SSO, governance, deployments)

Step 4: Score candidates with a simple rubric

Give each vendor a 1 to 5 in each category, then total it. This keeps the decision objective.

Category

How to score it quickly

Compliance

BAA available, clear retention, training policy clarity

Note quality

10-visit test: accuracy, brevity, specialty format consistency

Edit time

How many minutes to finalize a typical noteSteps to get note into chart (0 to 5 clicks is ideal)

EHR friction

Steps to get note into chart (0 to 5 clicks is ideal)

Reliability

Fails, latency, audio issues during real clinic days

Cost

Effective monthly cost per clinician at your expected volume

Tip: Run the test on the same 10 visits across tools. Do not compare “best note” to “average note.”

Step 5: Run a 7-day pilot that answers the only question that matters

Does it reduce your after-hours charting without increasing risk?

Pilot protocol

  • Day 1: Build 2 templates (short chronic follow-up, acute visit)
  • Days 2–6: Use it for 5–10 visits/day, track:
    • Draft time to generate
    • Minutes to finalize
    • Common misses (ROS, MDM elements, meds, counseling)
  • Day 7: Audit 10 notes for completeness and consistency

If your “minutes to finalize” does not drop meaningfully, it is not the best tool for your practice, even if the demo was impressive.

The verdict

Twofold is typically a strong fit when your priority is fast adoption in outpatient SMB settings and keeping notes structured and concise. It emphasizes practical templates and quick review workflows, which is often what determines whether charting time actually drops in the first week.

From a compliance standpoint, Twofold publishes educational guidance on why a BAA matters for AI note tools and positions BAA availability as a baseline requirement when PHI is involved.

If your practice needs a “set it up once, reuse forever” workflow, Twofold’s template‑driven approach can reduce variability between clinicians and reduce the tendency toward bloated, overly narrative notes, which is a common complaint with ambient drafts.

What Clinicians Are Saying on Reddit and Forums About Note Backlogs

Reddit
Reddit - r/healthIT

How Twofold can help: A lot of tools technically “save time,” but then you spend that time reorganizing the HPI or rewriting the assessment because it doesn’t reflect what you actually decided. That was my issue with a few others I trialed. The HPI reads like a clinical summary instead of raw conversation, and the assessment and plan usually reflect the actual decisions made during the visit. I’m still reviewing every note, but it feels like quality control rather than rebuilding the chart after the fact, which is what made me stick with it beyond the trial phase

Healthcare Forum
Healthcare Forum - Researchgate

How Twofold can help: The best one we tried is Twofold Health. It does a great job turning full sessions or dictations into structured notes like SOAP notes and it’s designed for outpatient workflows. That said, there’s no single “best” AI for everyone and it really depends on what you need. Tools like Suki and Dragon still work well if you prefer traditional dictation. The main things to look for are accuracy, privacy compliance and how well it fits your daily workflow. Most of these tools save time, but it’s worth testing a few to see which one feels the most reliable and natural for your style.

Comments

2 comments
Moderated Comments

All comments are reviewed by our moderators. Only comments that contribute meaningfully to the conversation will be approved and published.

You
SH

Shawn

Dr

1 months ago

I trialed a couple scribes and Twofold was the first one that stayed short enough for my 99214 notes.

JU

Julie

LMFT

1 months ago

If I care most about BAA + not training on my data, is Twofold actually clearer about this than the others, or am I missing something in their docs?

Reduce burnout,
improve patient care.

Join thousands of clinicians already using AI to become more efficient.


Related AI Scribe Wiki Articles